Make Mine Plastic

Plastic bags, long demonized by the Greenie Left. Sure they want to save the seals, birds and turtles. But who gives a f**k if 4000 people eventually lose their jobs? Extinct is forever as they say.

Well guess what, Attorney Stephen Joseph is mad as hell and he's not going to take it anymore!

Save The Plastic Bag

Learn cool things like whether or not plastic bags are really made from oil. Or how a never-ending campagin of mis-information has turned anyone requesting a plastic bag at the supermarket into Hitler's next-of-kin.

Denier Quote of the Day...

"As a dissenting physicist, I simply can no longer buy the notion that CO2 produces any significant warming of the atmosphere at any rate. I’ve studied the atomic absorption physics to death, from John Nicol’s extensive development to the much longer winded dissertation by Gerlich & Tscheuschner and everything in between, it simply doesn’t add up."

-James A. Peden
Former Atmospheric Physicist
Space Research and Coordination Center
July 14, 2008

Denial Down Under

Dr. David Evans, a former consultant to the Austrailian Greenhouse Office has recently penned an intresting commentary for the The Australian newspaper that is being conisdered by many on the climate debate circuit, quite the eye-opener...

No Smoking Hot Spot

Dr. Evans, the self-proclaimed "rocket-scientist" was in charge of developing and implmementing the Australian Governments FullCAM carbon emissions accounting program which measured the country's Kyoto Protocol compliance efforts. When he initially began the job in 1999, Dr. Evans, like most of his collegaues truly belived that there was a very strong link between human-borne CO2 emissions and increases in global tempreatures despite the fact there was virtually no emprical evidence to prove so...

"When I started that job in 1999 the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty good: CO2 is a greenhouse gas, the old ice core data, no other suspects."

But hey, why be so critical when you're on the government gravy train?

"The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly? Soon government and the scientific community were working together and lots of science research jobs were created. We scientists had political support, the ear of government, big budgets, and we felt fairly important and useful (well, I did anyway). It was great. We were working to save the planet."

Little did Dr. Evans know however, that over the next few years he would invaribly come to the conclusion that the empircal evidence on which any reprutable scientist relies, still had not surfaced...

"...since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming."

And so unlike many of his other colleagues, Dr. Evans has made the decision to publicly announce his dissent from the so-called consensus on human-borne climate change. A move often rife with ridicule and character assasination. And for all the political hyperbole about saving the planet and it's inhabitants. Dr. Evans brings to light something very, very sobering...

"The world has spent $50 billion on global warming since 1990, and we have not found any actual evidence that carbon emissions cause global warming. Evidence consists of observations made by someone at some time that supports the idea that carbon emissions cause global warming. Computer models and theoretical calculations are not evidence, they are just theory."

That's $50 Billion with a "B" folks. Tell the people starving in Africa and other parts of the World to chew on that for a while...

Denier Quote of the Day...

"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."

-Dr. Fred W. Decker

Professor of Meteorology

Oregon State University

June 23, 2008

It's Over?

Well put away the suncreen and flip-flops, because real climate change is now upon us. According to John L. Casey, Director of the Space & Science Research Center however, it's not what we were expecting...

Global Warming Has Ended – The Next Climate Change to A Pronounced Cold Era Has Begun

No before you start poo-pooing this book by it's cover, I strongly suggest looking into the prepared statement becuase to be honest, the guy does sound like he's got a pretty firm grip on his evidence.

"According to Mr. Casey, who spoke to print and TV media representatives today, this next cold era is coming about as a result of the reversal of the 206 year cycle of the sun which he independently discovered and announced in May of 2007."

Again with the Sun!? BTW, who the hell are these guys?

Ah debate! But isn't this what science is all about? (I mean real science, not Al-Gore, Hollywood special-effects kind of science). And from what I've read so far, it looks like these guys are spoiling for a fight. According to Casey and his network of internanational colleagues, we'd better get ready for the big chill. I mean, really ready...

“I have consulted with colleagues world wide who have reached a similar
conclusion. They have likewise been attempting to advise their own governments
and media of the impending cold era and the difficult times that the extreme
cold weather may bring. They are to be commended for their bold public stances
and publication of their research which of course has been in direct opposition
to past conventional thought on the nature and causes of the last twenty years
of global warming. These last one or two decades of increased global warming
were essentially the peak heating phase of the 206 year cycle.

And check this out, Casey really goes after the decades of flip-flopping by science and media regarding the subject of climate change. It's enough to give you whiplash...

"In the one hour presentation, Casey detailed the solar activity cycles that have been driving the Earth’s climate for the past 1,200 years. He condemned the climate change confusion and alarmism which has accompanied seven separate periods over the past 100 years, where scientists and the media flip-flopped on reporting that the Earth was either entering a new ‘ice age’ or headed for a global meltdown where melting glacial ice would swamp the planet’s coastal cities. "

So unlike what you may have heard before, a raging debate continues and we're all along for the ride.

Lizards Aren't Cute Like Polar Bears

Forget about Polar Bears. What about these poor reptiles that went extinct up in Antarctica, when their once mild habitat completely froze over? Talk about victims of climate change! Now, I've never been really good at math, but according to the article below, this happened way before we started driving around in SUVs...

New Fossils Suggest Ancient Cat-sized Reptiles in Antarctica

According to research, the now frozen tundras of Antarctica were once home to reptiles "the size of cats" Really...

"Cat-sized reptiles once roamed what is now the icebox of Antarctica, snuggling up in burrows and peeping above ground to snag plant roots and insects."

Last time I checked, reptiles don't like ice, so I'm not sure what conclusions to draw here, but believe it or not Antartica wasn't always the frozen wasteland we know today.

"At the time the ancient animals presumably were excavating their subterranean homes, Antarctica would have been ice-free, with a cool temperate climate, Miller said. And Antarctica and southern Africa could have shared residents, since during the Triassic, the two regions were connected as part of the supercontinent Pangea."

So for all those people running around worrying about glaciers receding and ice sheets melting away, don't forget that the climate is always changing and believe it or not, most (if not all) of it has nothing to do with you or your SUV.

It Slices, It Dices.

OK, for those of you who are already subscribing to the theory (despite emerging science that indicates otherwise) that increased green-house gas emissions (namely C02) are the chief cause of a warming climate, I've got some intresting news. Let's say for the sake of argument that you are right and that we do need to keep a close watch on man-made CO2 levels in order to keep the climate in balance. Just how do we go about doing that? Well according to those on the socialist side of the house, man-made CO2 emissions can be reduced by a carefully implemented plan of punishment and control. Better known as tax and regulate. So far, it seems that this has been the only proposed solution for this yet to be verified crisis. But as luck would have it, a new idea looms on the co2-choked horizon... Don't like so much CO2 in the atmosphere? No problem... just suck it all out. Like a big giant vacuum...

Machine to clean up greenhouse gas is breakthrough in war on global warming, say scientists

That's right folks, free enterprise and the spirit of innovation strike again.

According to the article however, this kind of non-oppressive approach to a potential problem has many environmentalists on the climate-change-vegan-gravy-train in a bit of an uproar...

"The idea is bound to be controversial, with environmentalists seeing so-called technological solutions to global warming as undermining attempts to promote greener lifestyles and industries"

Translation? "Greener lifestyles and industries" = only those that can be taxed and regulated by the heavy hand of Big Government.

Now how much would you pay? Don't answer just yet. Order in the next 10 minutes and we'll send you a second unit absolutely free!